IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 10, October 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



A New Modified Version Of Gauss-Seidel Iterative Method Using Grouping Relaxation Approach

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Baher A. Haleem, Ihab M. El Aghoury, Bahaa S. Tork, Hisham A. El-Arabaty

 

KEYWORDS

Systems of linear equations, Finite element method, Direct techniques, Indirect techniques, Stationary iterative methods, Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel.

 

ABSTRACT

Systems of linear equations appear in many areas either directly as in modeling physical situations or indirectly as in the numerical solutions of other mathematical models. The solution of the linear equations’ system is probably the most important issue in numerical methods like the finite element method (FEM). Using the finite element method in modeling various structures, with either simple or complicated configuration of elements, in structural engineering became prevalent many years ago. There are two main types of solvers depending on whether the used method is direct or iterative (indirect) method. In contrast to the iterative techniques, the direct techniques provide almost exact solutions, however they are not convenient for some situations, including but not limited to huge systems of equations. In such situations, the iterative solvers are favored as they have privileges concerning solving speed and storage requirements. In addition, indirect solvers are simpler to program. This research focuses on using the Classical (Stationary) iterative techniques for solving linear systems of equations. The main objective of this research is to develop a new modified version of the well-known Gauss-Seidel (GS) iterative technique which is adapted to solving problems in structural engineering. The proposed technique remarkably outperforms GS technique regarding the required number of iterations and the convergence speed. In this paper, the differences between the direct and iterative approaches have been discussed, along with a quick overview of some of the methods underlying these two classes. Then, the idea and algorithm of the new proposed “Modified Gauss-Seidel” (MGS) technique have been elucidated. Afterward, the algorithm has been programmed and used to solve some 2D Practical Examples, besides using the conventional Jacobi and GS techniques. Finally, the obtained results have been compared to assess the proposed MGS; it outperformed both Jacobi and GS.

 

REFERENCES

[1] A. H. Laskar and S. Behera, “Refinement of Iterative Methods for the Solution of System of Linear Equations Ax=b,” IOSR J. Math., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 70–73, 2014.
[2] H. M. Antia, Numerical methods for scientists and engineers. Hindustan Book Agency, 2012.
[3] P. R. Turner and D. Towers, Guide to Numerical Analysis. Macmillan Education, Limited, 1989.
[4] D. S. Watkins, Fundamentals of matrix computations, 3rd ed. WILEY, 2010.
[5] A. Bakari and I. Dahiru, “Comparison of Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel Iterative Methods for the Solution of Systems of Linear Equations,” Asian Res. J. Math., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2018.
[6] H. Liu and T. Feng, “Study on the convergence of solving linear equations by gauss-seidel and jacobi method,” Proc. - 2015 11th Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Secur. CIS 2015, pp. 100–103, 2016.
[7] D. K. Salkuyeh, “Generalized Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel Methods for Solving Linear System of Equations,” vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 164–170, 2007.
[8] S. Y., Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. New York: PWS Press, 1995.
[9] B. N. Datta, Numerical Linear Algebra and Applications. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1995.
[10] S. M. H. Mirfallah and M. Bozorgnasab, “A New Jacobi-based Iterative Method for the Classical Analysis of Structures,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 12, pp. 2581–2617, 2015.
[11] H. P. Gavin, “Structural Element Stiffness , Mass , and Damping Matrices.” CEE 541. Structural Dynamics-Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering-Duke University, pp. 1–35, 2018.