|
Evaluation Of English Subject Learning Of Senior High School In Mataram City, Indonesia.
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Yuliansari, Amat Jaedun, Siti Aminah, Rizaldi
KEYWORDS
English teaching, Program Evaluation, Stake’s Countenance
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research is to evaluate the English learning program of senior high school in Mataram based on the Regulation of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 81A of 2013 on Implementation of Curriculum. This research is evaluation program research with the quantitative descriptive approach, and the evaluation model used Stake’s Countenance. The component of evaluation includes antecedents, transactions, and outputs. Data collection used lesson plan analyzing, observation, questionnaire, and document. The conclusions of this study are. (1) The input (antecedents), the planning of English learning include in very good category (100 percent). It is found that the lesson plan is in accordance with the standard of learning process. (2) The process (transaction), the implementation of English learning include in good category (59.66 percent). There is suitability between implementation of learning and standard of implementation learning process. (3) Student’ learning result met the criteria of minimum completeness, with the actuality of completeness include in good category (98.37 percent).
REFERENCES
[1] Subyakto-Nababan, S.U.: ‘Metodologi pengajaran bahasa’ (Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1993. 1993)
[2] Lukum, A.: ‘Evaluasi program pembelajaran IPA SMP menggunakan model countenance stake’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2015, 19, (1), pp. 25-37
[3] Kemendikbud: ‘Permendikbud Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Permendikbud Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum’ (kemendikbud, 2013, edn.), pp.
[4] Kemendikbud: ‘Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan dan Menengah’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan dan Menengah’ (kemendikbud, 2016, edn.), pp.
[5] Kartowagiran, B.: ‘Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Monitoring Dan Implementasinya. Bahan Penyelenggaraan Calon Tim Pelatih Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Provinsi DKI Jakarta’ (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2006. 2006)
[6] Stufflebeam, D.L., and Shinkfield, A.J.: ‘Stufflebeam’s improvement-oriented evaluation’: ‘Systematic evaluation’ (Springer, 1985), pp. 151-207
[7] Mardapi, D.: ‘Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan’, Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 2012
[8] Fernandes, H.: ‘Evaluation of educational programs’, Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluating and Curriculum Development, 1984
[9] Stake, R.E.: ‘The countenance of educational evaluation’ (Citeseer, 1967. 1967)
[10] Stake, R.E.: ‘Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation’: ‘Evaluation models’ (Springer, 1983), pp. 287-310
|
