Interconnectivity Multi Criteria For Sustainable Development Of Beef Cattle

Abstract :This research is aimed to analyze the multi criteria stakeholders in the development of sustainable beef cattle by using Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). There were 35 samples were observed. Data and information were collected through focus group discussion among stakeholders. By using a multi-criteria sustainability which was promoted by the Indonesian National Council on Climate Change as guidance, stakeholders were participating to pay close attention deeply, until they found criterion and subcriterion level of their choices about sustainable beef cattle development. The analysis of criterion-subcriterion level were conducted by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results indicate that Economic criteria (E) becomes the primary priority, followed by other criteria. While subcriterion and interconnectivity analysis reveals that the priority of sustainable beef cattle development are interconnection of addition of investment on govemment budget (E2), establishment of cattle farmer community (S3), ecology functions are preserved (L1) with criteria and subcriteria, leaving out experimental technology and outdated technology (T2). Although the development of sustainable beef cattle has complexity (multi stakeholder and multi criteria), should be facilitated in order to contributing each other towards one mission and the same purpose namely, development of sustainable beef cattle.

REFERENCES

[1]. WCED:World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our Common Future.s Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[2]. Peezet,J.C.V,2004.Sustainability Policy and Environmental Policy. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106 (2).339-359.

[3]. Kementan (Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia), 2010. Undang-Undang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Kementan RI, Jakarta.

[4]. Syarifuddin Hutwan, 2009. Indeks Keberlanjutan Integrasi Tanaman dengan Ternak (Crop Livestock System) di Kuamang Kuning Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan Februari, 2009, Vol. XII. No.1:41-49.

[5]. Sutanto Adi & Listiari Hendraningsih, 2011. Analisis Keberlanjutan Usaha Sapi Perah Di Kecamatan Ngantang Kabupaten Malang Gamma Volume 7, Nomor 1, September 2011: 01 � 12

[6]. Kementan (Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia), 2012. Rencana Strategi Pengembangan Peternakan Sapi Indonesia. Kementan RI, Jakarta.

[7]. BPS, 2012. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Indonesia 2012. Jakarta, Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS).

[8]. BPS, 2012. Neraca Ekport-Impor Pangan Indonesia 2012. Jakarta, Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS).

[9]. BPS, 2012. Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Biro Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.

[10]. Arifin Bustanul, 2013. Analisis Ekonomi. Koran KOMPAS, Senin, 4 Februari 2013

[11]. Iqbal Muhamaad, 2007. Analisis Peran Pemangku Kepentingan Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pembangunan Pertanian. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 26(3), 2007, 89-99

[12]. Sugeng Setya Cayanto, Bonifasius S.P., Ataabik Muktaman, 2010. Penguatan Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Sosulsi Permasalahan Ketahanan Pangan Nasional. Prosiding International Conference On Indonesian Studies, 835-851.

[13]. Roger E.M,1983 Diffusion of Innovations.Thrid Edition. Free Press, New York.

[14]. Scott, James C. 1993. Perlawanan Kaum Tani. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta. 384 hal.

[15]. Popkin, Samuel.L. 1986. Rational Choice,The Political of Peasant Socity (Fist-Ed), New York University Press, New York. 266.

[16]. Uphoff, Norman. 1992. Local Institutional Development and Participation for Sustainable Development. Gatekeeper Series SA31 , IIED, London.

[17]. Kurtz, M. J. 2000. Understanding Peasant Revolution: from Concept to Theory and Case in Theory and Society (29:93-124).
[18]. Aliye Ahu Akgun, Eveline Van Leeuwen, and Peter Nijkamp,2012. A Multi-Aktor Multi-Criteria Scenario Analysis of Regional sustainable Resource Policy. Ecological Econimics, 78 (2012), 19-28.

[19]. Freeman, R. Edward, 1998. A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation, dalam L.B. Pincus (ed.), Perspectives in Business Ethics, Singapore: McGraw Hill, hlm. 171-181.

[20]. Perda Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Tahun 2009 � 2029, Pemerintah Daerah Sulawesi Selatan, Makassar.

[21]. Amanah Siti, 2003. Metode PRA dan RRA. Prosiding Pelatihan Untuk Pelatih Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Terpadu. Kementerian Perikanan dan Kelautan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 103-120

[22]. DNPI, 2010. Kriteria Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta, Dewan Nasional Pemanasan Global Indonesia (DNPI), Jakarta

[23]. Saaty, Thomas L., 2005 Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefimbangunan Kota Indonesia Dalam Abad 21 : Buku 1, Konsep Dan Pendekatan Pembangunan Perkotaan Di Indonesia, Lembaga Penerbit FEUI

[24]. Sarosa Wicaksono, 2005. Bunga rampai pembangunan kota indonesia dalam abad 21 : buku 1, konsep dan pendekatan pembangunan perkotaan di Indonesia ,lembaga penerbit FEUI

[25]. Todaro, Michael P & Stephen C. Smith, 1998. Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Dunia Ketiga (Terjemahan), Edisi Pertama. Jakarta. Airlangga.

[26]. Adams, W. M., 1990, Green Development Environment and Sustainability in the Third World, London and New York: Routledge

[27]. Becker, Egon, dan T. Jahn, (eds), 1999, Sustainability and The Social Sciences, New York: UNESCO dan ESOI.

[28]. Budinam Arief, 1995. Teori Pembangunan Dunia Ketiga. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

[29]. Briffetta, C., Obbardb, J.P., dan Mackee (2003) Towards SEA for the developing nations of Asia. Environmental Impact Assessment. Review. 23 (2003) 171�196

[30]. OECD (2006) Applying Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment: Good Practice Guidance for Development Cooperation. OECD Publishing.

[31]. Amin Mappadjantji, 2005. Kemandirian Lokal. Gramedia Utama Pustaka, Jakarta.