IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 10 - Issue 6, June 2021 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Impact Analysis Of Wildfire By Means Of Satellite Based Cyber-Physical System

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Nasru Minallah, M. Nouman Khan , Waleed Khan, Muhammad Athar Javed Sethi, Atif Sardar Khan

 

KEYWORDS

Wildfire; environment; Atmosphere; Pollutants; Google Earth Engine; Sentinel-5p, Landsat 8;

 

ABSTRACT

This work proposes a satellite based Cyber-Physical System for impact analysis of wildfire. Wildfire can may occur due to human activities or natural phenomenon such as lightning and have substantial impact on living beings and the environment. Analysis of Australia wildfire shows a drastic change in vegetation and atmosphere of Australia. Biomass burning is one of major source of emission of pollutants. The major air pollutants are carbon dioxide ( ), carbon monoxide ( ), nitrogen dioxide ( ), ozone ( ), sulfur dioxide ( ), formaldehyde ( ) and particulate matter (PM). To monitor air quality, we have to investigate the extent of these gases in air. Traditional method involving installation of embedded systems-based air quality measurement equipment are too much costly and have limitations as it can be installed in a limited area. Satellite-based Cyber-Physical System is an alternate technique for detecting damages caused by wildfire. This paper aims to investigate impact of wildfire on atmosphere and vegetation of Australia, through Satellite-based Cyber-Physical System, while employing Sentinel-5 Precursor (Sentinel-5p) and Landsat 8 satellites using Google Earth Engine. Using our proposed Cyber-Physical System, we processed pre-fire dataset (2019-11-05 -to- 2019-11-07) and post-fire dataset (2019-11-08 -to- 2019-11-13) of Sentinel-5p and Landsat 8 in utilizing Google Earth Engine. Our analysis shows a severe decrease, of nearly 100%, in healthy vegetation and drastic increase of almost 112% in , 260% in , 264% in aerosol index, 144% in in New South Wales and its nearby cities of Australia. Our analysis proved that as compared to up-to-date fire monitoring systems, our proposed Satellite-based Cyber-Physical System have a great potential in making critical decisions and shows appreciable performance in productivity, safety, reliability and serviceability.

 

REFERENCES

BBC, Australia bushfires. 2019: https://www.bbc.com/.
[2] EOS, Five Environmental Consequences of Australia’s Fires 2020.
[3] Accuweather, Australia wildfire damages and losses to exceed $100 billion, AccuWeather estimates 2020.
[4] Erten, E., V. Kurgun, and N. Musaoglu. Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS: a case study. in XXth Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Istanbul, Turkey. 2004.
[5] Wu, F.-J., Y.-F. Kao, and Y.-C. Tseng, From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems. Pervasive and Mobile computing, 2011. 7(4): p. 397-413.
[6] Lee, I. Sokolsky. O,“Health Cyber Physical Systems,”. in 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Anaheim. 2010.
[7] Liu, Z., et al., Cyber-physical-social systems for command and control. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2011. 26(4): p. 92-96.
[8] Muratov, Y.R., et al. Estimation of distance to objects by stereovision. in 2015 4th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO). 2015. IEEE.
[9] Hoang, D.D., H.-Y. Paik, and C.-K. Kim, Service-oriented middleware architectures for cyber-physical systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2012. 12(1): p. 79-87.
[10] Jóźwiak, L., Embedded computing technology for highly-demanding cyber-physical systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015. 48(4): p. 19-30.
[11] Birdal, A.C., U. Avdan, and T. Türk, Estimating tree heights with images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2017. 8(2): p. 1144-1156.
[12] Guangmeng, G. and Z. Mei, Using MODIS land surface temperature to evaluate forest fire risk of northeast China. IEEE Geoscience and Remote sensing letters, 2004. 1(2): p. 98-100.
[13] Sivrikaya, F., et al., Evaluation of forest fire risk with GIS. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2014. 23(1).
[14] Teodoro, A.C. and L. Duarte, Forest fire risk maps: a GIS open source application–a case study in Norwest of Portugal. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2013. 27(4): p. 699-720.
[15] Çolak, E. and F. Sunar, Evaluation of forest fire risk in the Mediterranean Turkish forests: A case study of Menderes region, Izmir. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020: p. 101479.
[16] Saglam, B., et al., Spatio-temporal analysis of forest fire risk and danger using LANDSAT imagery. Sensors, 2008. 8(6): p. 3970-3987.
[17] García-Llamas, P., et al., Environmental drivers of fire severity in extreme fire events that affect Mediterranean pine forest ecosystems. Forest ecology and management, 2019. 433: p. 24-32.
[18] Ahmadi, V., Crisis Management in Forest Fire by use of Image Landsat in Model Fire Risk (Case Study: Bioreh Protected Area, Illam Province). Geospatial Engineering Journal, 2019. 10(2): p. 27-37.
[19] Akbulak, C., et al., Forest fire risk analysis via integration of GIS, RS and AHP: The Case of Çanakkale, Turkey. Journal of Human Sciences, 2018. 15(4): p. 2127-2143.
[20] Theys, N., et al., Global monitoring of volcanic SO 2 degassing with unprecedented resolution from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor. Scientific reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 2643.
[21] Ingmann, P., et al., Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and-5p. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012. 120: p. 58-69.
[22] Shen, L., et al., An evaluation of the ability of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) to observe boundary layer ozone pollution across China: application to 2005–2017 ozone trends. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019. 19(9): p. 6551-6560.
[23] Goldberg, D.L., et al., Enhanced capabilities of TROPOMI NO2: Estimating NOx from North American cities and power plants. Environmental science & technology, 2019.
[24] Gorelick, N., et al., Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017. 202: p. 18-27.
[25] Landgrebe, D.A. Some fundamentals and methods for hyperspectral image data analysis. in Systems and technologies for clinical diagnostics and drug discovery II. 1999. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
[26] Kutnjak, H., et al., Seasonal phenology dynamics of alfalfa consociation with Italian ryegrass based on NDVI from Sentinel-2. sa55, 2020: p. 49.
[27] hub, S. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index). 2005; Available from: https://www.sentinel-hub.com/eoproducts/ndvi-normalized-difference-vegetation-index.
[28] Hvidtfeldt, U.A., et al., Long-term residential exposure to PM2. 5, PM10, black carbon, NO2, and ozone and mortality in a Danish cohort. Environment international, 2019. 123: p. 265-272.
[29] Abbasi, A. and J.J. Sardroodi, TiO2/graphene oxide heterostructures for gas-sensing: Interaction of nitrogen dioxide with the pristine and nitrogen modified nanostructures investigated by DFT. Surface Review and Letters, 2019. 26(04): p. 1850170.
[30] Shon, Z.-H., K.-H. Kim, and S.-K. Song, Long-term trend in NO2 and NOx levels and their emission ratio in relation to road traffic activities in East Asia. Atmospheric environment, 2011. 45(18): p. 3120-3131.
[31] Richter, A., et al., GOME measurements of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO. Advances in Space Research, 2002. 29(11): p. 1667-1672.
[32] Zheng, Z., et al., Spatial Variation of NO2 and Its Impact Factors in China: An Application of Sentinel-5P Products. Remote Sensing, 2019. 11(16): p. 1939.
[33] Heritage, D.o.t.E.a., Air quality fact sheet. 2005.
[34] Qu, P. and Y. Yin. Impacts of Summer Biomass Burning in Australia on Carbon Monoxide, Ozone and Aerosols in the Troposphere of Darwin. in 2008 International Workshop on Education Technology and Training & 2008 International Workshop on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2008. IEEE.
[35] Edwards, D., et al., Satellite‐observed pollution from Southern Hemisphere biomass burning. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2006. 111(D14).
[36] Yurganov, L., et al., Satellite-and ground-based CO total column observations over 2010 Russian fires: accuracy of top-down estimates based on thermal IR satellite data. UMBC Physics Department, 2011.
[37] Badarinath, K., et al., Analysis of aerosol and carbon monoxide characteristics over Arabian Sea during crop residue burning period in the Indo-Gangetic Plains using multi-satellite remote sensing datasets. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2009. 71(12): p. 1267-1276.
[38] Zhu, L., et al., Formaldehyde (HCHO) as a hazardous air pollutant: Mapping surface air concentrations from satellite and inferring cancer risks in the United States. Environmental science & technology, 2017. 51(10): p. 5650-5657.