International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 6, June 2016 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Reviewing The Connectedness To Nature Of Selected Filipino Learners

[Full Text]



Ian Phil M. Canlas, Rosario M. Canlas, Ma. Victoria D. Naboya, Nancy A. Coton



connectedness to nature, Filipino learners, environmental education, environmental awareness.



This study attempted to find out the sense of connectedness to nature of selected Filipino learners. About 381 respondents from Year 4 to Year 12 coming from public central school, national high school, vocational school and a state university located in the central part of the Philippines took the Connectedness to Nature Scale. Computed weighted mean were compared across levels, ages and genders. Results were positive in the elementary and secondary level but disjointed for Year 11 and 12. A difference in the weighted mean was also recorded across genders.



[1] ______ “Republic Act Number 9512, An Act ,to promote Environmental Awareness through Environmental Education and for other purposes,” Official Gazette, online available www.gov.ph, 2008.

[2] ______ “Department of Education Order Number 52 series 2011, Strengthening Environmental Education in Public and Private Schools,” online available www.deped.gov.ph, 2011.

[3] ______ “Commission on Higher Education Memorandum Order Number 33 series 2009, Integration of Environmental Education in the Tertiary Education Curriculum particularly the Civic Welfare and Training Service component if the National Training Service Program,” online available www.ched.gov.ph, 2009.

[4] Ernst, J. and Theimer, S. “Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 577-589, 2011.

[5] Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B., and Hill, D. “Environmental Education Program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned?,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 581-611, 2014.

[6] Lieflander, A. K. “Effectiveness of environmental education on water: connectedness to nature, environmental attitudes and environmental knowledge,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 145-146, 2014.

[7] Sehlola, S. and Jita, L. C. (2010) A Case Study of the Integration of Environmental Education in the Primary School Curriculum, In S. Soomro (Ed) New Achievements in Technology Education and Development, 257-270

[8] Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., and Chao, M. M. “Saving Mr. Nature: Anthromorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 49 no. 3, pp. 514-521, 2013.

[9] Lieflander, A. K., Frohlich, G., Bogner, F. X., and Schultz, W. “Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education”, Environmental Education Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 370-384, 2012.

[10] Hungerford, H. R. and Volk, T. L. “Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education,” The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 8-21, 2013.

[11] Chawla, L. and Cushing, D. F. “Education for strategic environmental behavior,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 13 no. 4, pp. 437-452, 2007.

[12] Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. “Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239-260, 2010.

[13] Olivos, P. Aragones, J. I., and Amerigo, M. “The Connectedness to Nature Scale and its Relationship to Environmental Beliefs and Identity,” International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2011.

[14] Frantz, C., Mayer, F. S., and Norton, C., Rock, M. “There is no “I” in nature: The influence of self-awareness and connectedness to nature,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 427-436, 2005.

[15] Cheng, J. C. H. and Monroe, M. C. “Connection to Nature: Children’s Affective Attitude toward Nature,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31-49, 2010.

[16] Hoot, R. E. and Friedman, H. “Connectedness and Environmental Behavior: Sense of Interconnectedness and Pro-Environmental Behavior,” International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, vol. 30, nos. 1-2, pp. 89-100, 2011.

[17] Gosling, E. and Williams, K. J. H. “Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behavior: Testing connectedness theory among farmers,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 289-304, 2000.

[18] Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., and Dolliver, K. “Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 607-643, 2008.

[19] Canlas, I. P. “Environmental Protection Initiatives of Selected Local Government Units in Eastern Visayas, Philippines” Sanghiran Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 2, pp. 66-75, 2014.

[20] Canlas, I. P. “Reviewing the Patterns, Motivations and Barriers in the teaching of Climate Science among Elementary Classrooms,” Sanghiran Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 2, pp. 1-9, 2014.

[21] Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M. “The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 24, no.4, pp. 503-515, 2004.