IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 7, July 2016 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Corruption Eradication In The Perspective Of Criminology

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

La Niasa, H.M. Said Karim, Andi Sofyan, Syamsuddin Muchtar

 

KEYWORDS

Criminal Law, Corruption, Criminology

 

ABSTRACT

This research aimed to find out the substance of corruption as an extraordinary crime and the efforts that can be taken in eradicate corruption. This research is in the field of criminal law. This study is a normative-empirical research; a legal research that its study is statutory provisions (in abstracto) is linked with the field application (in concreto). The results of research showed that: 1) the substance of corruption is an evil act or reprehensible by law qualified or labeled as a form of corruption. Acts of corruption assessed as an extraordinary crime because of its systematic and wide-ranging impact, and contrary to the interests of the country in general. 2) the arrangement of corruption involves two major aspects of prevention and prosecution aspects. Establishment of legislation was based by desire to bring state enforcement are clean and free from corruption as a policy basis. 3) Efforts to eradicate corruption can be divided into two, i.e prevention, and curative. Prevention undertaken by government and law enforcement agencies is still low, so it needs to be further improved. Criminal sanctions imposed on the corruptor, also tend to just apply the minimum criminal sanctions. Types of corruption are most prevalent in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia is corruption related to acts of abuse of authority or position.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Andi Hamzah. (2005). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, page. 10

[2] B. Simandjuntak. (1981). Pengantar Kriminologi dan Patologi Sosial, Tarsito, Bandung, page 310.

[3] Edi Suandi Hamid and Muhammad Sayuti (Ed). (1999). Menyingkap Korupsi, Kolusi, Nepotisme di Indonesia, Aditya Media, Yogyakarta, page. v

[4] Indonesian Corruption Watch, ICW. (2013). Trend Pemberantasan Korupsi, Annual Report. page. 8

[5] Kian, A. (2015). Tindak Pidana Credit/Debit Card Fraud dan Penerapan Sanksi Pidananya dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(1), 47-60. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n1.39

[6] M. Busyro Muqoddas. (2008). Korupsi Sudah Menjadi Endemik. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. http://www.komisiyudisial.go.id. Accessed on 8 June 2014

[7] Mien Rukmini. (2009). Aspek Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, Alumni, Bandung, pages. 111

[8] Satjipto Rahardjo. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif, Kompas, Jakarta, page. 127

[9] Sri Suwitri. (2007). Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia: Sebuah Upaya Reformasi Birokrasi. Dialoque Journal, 4(1): 23-41.

[10] Suroso, F. (2016). The Possibility of Vice-Presidentsí Authority Arrangement in the 1945 Constitution through Constitutional Amendment. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(1), 130-151. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n1.220