IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 5, May 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Auditor Switching Behavior In LQ45 Companies In Indonesia

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Andreas, Enni Savitri

 

KEYWORDS

Auditor Switching, Audit Opinion, Public Accounting Firm Size, Management Changes

 

ABSTRACT

Auditor switching is a management action to switch the most recent company auditor. The management of public companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange are known to use auditor switching. There are some reasons that encourage management of public companies to make auditor changes. These include audit opinions, the size of public accounting firms and changes in management. The study was conducted on companies that meet criteria of LQ45 index, and this companies are recalculated twice a year by Indonesian Stock Exchange research and development department. Based on the sample selection criteria a sample of 33 companies was obtained. Data analysis used logistic regression analysis. The results of the study indicate that audit opinions and management changes had no effect on auditor switching, but the size of the public accounting firm was evidently influence the decisions of the public companies’ management to implement an auditor switch.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Al-KhouryAbeer F; Ali Ala’eddin; Al-Sharif Mahmoud; Hanania Jabra; Al-Malki Iyad and Jallad Mohammad (2015), “Auditor independence and mandatory auditor rotation in Jordan”, International Business Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 73-82, March. Canadian Center of Science and Education.

[2] Bagherpour M.; Monroe G. and Greg S. (2010), “Auditor switching in an increasingly competitive audit market”, Working Paper.

[3] Beattie V. & Fearnley S. (1998), “The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in UK listed companies”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 63, pp. 605-622.

[4] Chen C.L; Chang FH; and Yen G. (2005), “The information contents of auditor change in financial distress prediction-empirical findings from the TALEX-listed firms”, draft of paper, retrieved from www.google.com, at January 12, 2012.

[5] Chen K. and Church B. (1996), “Going concern opinions and the market’s reaction to bankruptcy filings”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 71.

[6] Fleak S. and Wilson E. (1994),“The incremental information content of the going concern audit opinion”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 9.

[7] Gul F.A (1992), “A note on audit qualification and switches: Some further evidence from a small sample study”, Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, (spring), pp. 111-120.

[8] Haskins M.E. & Williams D.D. (1990), “A contingent model of intra-Big 8 auditor changes”, Auditing, Vol. 9, pp. 55-74.

[9] Ho, JLY & Wang, J (2006), ‘Examination of audit fees premiums and auditor switching pre and post the demise of Arthur Andersen and the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley Act’, Working Paper at Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, USA.

[10] Hudaib, M. and Cooke, T.E. (2005). ‘The impact of managing director changes and financial distress on audit qualification and auditor switching’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(9) & (10), 1703-1738

[11] Ismail SH and Aliahmed H. (2008), “Why Malaysian second board companies switch auditors: Evidence of Bursa Malaysia”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 13, pp. 123-130.

[12] Jones F. (1996), “The information content of the auditor’s going concern evaluation”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 15.

[13] Khasharmeh Hussein Ali. (2015). Determinants of auditor switching in Bahrain’s listed companies - an empirical study, European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research Vol.3, No.11, pp.73-99

[14] Krishnan J. (1994), “Auditor switching and conservatism”, The Accounting Review, Vol.60, No. 1, pp. 200-215.

[15] Lenno X C. (1999), “Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses”, Journal of Business and Accounting, Vol. 26, No. 7/8, pp. 779-805.

[16] Lin Z. Jun and Liu (2010), “The determinants of auditor switching from the perspective of corporate governance in China”, Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 117-127

[17] Liu, F., Zhao, J., Tu, G., Huang, Y. (2010). Does the right of choosing the auditor matters: a test of auditor reputation. Accounting research 12, 49–56 (in Chinese).

[18] Mautsz, RK & Sharaf, HA (1961), Philosophy of auditing, American Accounting Association, USA.

[19] Mazri S.N.; Smith M. and Ismail Z. (2012), “Factors influencing auditor change: Evidence from Malaysia”, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 222 - 240.

[20] Poels.L.(2011). Auditor Switching Behavior in Medium Sized Companies in the Netherlands Master Thesis, Accounting Department Faculty of Economics and Business Studies Tilburg University.

[21] Schwartz K.B. and K. Menon (1988). “Auditor switches by failing firms”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 248-261.

[22] Suyono; Yi; and Riswan. (2013). Determinant Factors Affecting The Auditor Switching: An Indonesian Case, Global Review of Accounting and Finance Vol. 4. No. 2, pp. 103-116.

[23] Takiyah M.I and Ghazali S.M. (1993), “Incidence of Qualified opinions and the effects on auditor switching: An empirical study in Malaysia”, Management Journal (December), pp. 53-63.

[24] Tu Guoqian (2012). Controller changes and auditor changes, China Journal of Accounting Research 5, 45-58

[25] Weiner J. (2012), “Auditor size vs. Auditor quality: An analysis of auditor switches”, Thesis of Honors College, University of Houston.

[26] Williams, D.D. (1988), “The potential determinants of auditor change”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer, pp. 243-261.