International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 4, April 2016 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

A Participatory Systemic Approach To Rural Community Development In Vietnam

[Full Text]



Tuan M. Ha, Ockie J.H. Bosch, Nam C. Nguyen



Action research, Rural community development, Evolutionary Learning Laboratory, Stakeholders, Systems approaches, Transformative learning.



Various failures of the traditional approach in community development in developing countries have led to the development of a more appropriate and holistic approach to address complex development issues. Systems approaches and cutting-edge tools have recently been embraced to deal with such complexities under contexts of interwoven relationships amongst social, economic, political, cultural and environmental factors. This paper provides reflections on practical value of the Evolutionary Learning Laboratory (ELLab) through a case study on improving the quality of life for women farmers in northern Vietnam, where gender-bias labour hardship and poor living-standard are evident. The first five steps of the participatory systems-based ELLab were implemented during 2013-2014 providing valuable results that have made both practical and theoretical contributions with substantial implications to community development. Our study finds that the context-based results reshaped the original project goal. The approach and framework helped to identify and engage right stakeholders in problem analyses and decision making activities. Fuzzy problems within the complex web of life of the women and rural households were uncovered using relevant systems tools to develop a big picture (systems model) of the current situation, defining levers for systemic interventions. The ELLab helps to build capacity of local people for taking ownership of the process and outcomes to guarantee sustainability and long-term impacts. It also facilitates true participation and co-learning amongst stakeholders, triggering transformative learning. Contributions to action research and an innovative mechanism for sharing reflections and lessons at both local and global levels via the online Think2ImpactTM are discussed.



[1] Herren, H.R., Agriculture: investing in natural capital, in United Nations Environment Programme2011, Millennium Institute: Arlington, VA, USA.

[2] Garcia, Z., J. Nyberg, and S.O. Saadat, Agriculture, trade negotiations and gender, 2006, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Italy.

[3] Fischer, E. and M. Qaim, Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development, 2012. 40(6): p. 1255-1268.

[4] Lipton, M., Why poor people stay poor : urban bias in world development / Michael Lipton. 1977, Cambridge: Cambridge : Harvard University Press.

[5] Thirtle, C., L. Lin, and J. Piesse, The Impact of Research-Led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Development, 2003. 31(12): p. 1959-1975.

[6] Quisumbing, A.R. and L. Pandolfelli, Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development, 2010. 38(4): p. 581-592.

[7] Bosch, O.J.H., et al., Using a systemic approach to improve the quality of life for women in small-scale agriculture: Empirical evidence from Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, in 3rd International Symposium on Advances in Business Management Toward Systemic Approach, 21-23 January 2015, G. Dominici, Editor 2015, Business Systems Review: Perugia, Italy. In Dominici et al. (2015) BoA-B.S.LAB-2015: 280-285.

[8] Trinh, C.T., et al., Using a Systems Approach to Improve the Lives of Women Smallholder Farmers in the Northern Mountainous Region of Vietnam, in 8th Vietnam Economists Annual Meeting (VEAM), 9-10 June 2015, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam2015, DEPOCEN.

[9] Khavul, S. and G.D. Bruton, Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 2013. 50(2): p. 285-306.

[10] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Defining the real needs of women smallholders in Vietnam: the importance of grassroots participation and multi-stakeholder collaboration. International Journal of Business and Management Review 2015. 3(2): p. 35-58.

[11] Paris, T.R. and T.T.N. Chi, The Impact of Row Seeder Technology on Women Labor: A Case Study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Gender, Technology and Development, 2005. 9(2): p. 157-184.

[12] Lanchman, B.E., Linking sustainable community activities to pollution prevention: a sourcebook. 1997, Santa Monica, CA: Critical Technologies Institute, RAND.

[13] Doss, C.R., Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experience. World Development, 2001. 29(12): p. 2075-2092.

[14] Chan, S.-L. and S.-L. Huang, A systems approach for the development of a sustainable community—the application of the sensitivity model (SM). Journal of Environmental Management, 2004. 72(3): p. 133-147.

[15] Swisher, M.E. and K.N. Monaghan Sustainable Community Development, The University of Florida - Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) 2014.

[16] Cook, P., A Systems View of Community Engagement: Exploration for Simple Rules of Interaction to Explain Community Resistance in Landfill Siting Situations, in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-20142014, ISSS: Washington DC, USA.

[17] Bosch, O.J.H., et al., Managing Complex Issues through Evolutionary Learning Laboratories. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2013. 30(2): p. 116-135.

[18] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Using the community capitals framework for resource mapping and mobilisation toward sustainable community development: a case study on improving the quality of life of Vietnamese women farmers. 2015 (submitted for publication).

[19] Bland, B., A framework for enquiry into agricultural systems, in Sustainable Agriculture, 2005, University of Wisconsin-Madison: Madison.

[20] de Bie, C., Comparative performance analysis of agro-ecosystems, in The International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), 2000, Wageningen University: Netherlands.

[21] Krause, M., H. Uibrig, and B. Kidane, Decision modelling for the integration of woody plants in smallholder farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 2007. 108(1): p. 1-17.

[22] Karlı, B., A. Bilgiç, and Y. Çelik, Factors affecting farmers’ decision to enter agricultural cooperatives using random utility model in the South Eastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 2006. 107(2): p. 115-127.

[23] Adeoti, A.I., Factors influencing irrigation technology adoption and its impact on household poverty in Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 2008. 109(1): p. 51-63.

[24] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Establishing and Evolutionary Learning Laboratory for improving the quality of life of Vietnamese women in small-scale agriculture: Part II - Systemic interventions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2015. In Press (early view: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sres.2349/abstract).

[25] Ragasa, C., Gender and Institutional Dimensions of Agricultural Technology Adoption: A Review of Literature and Synthesis of 35 Case Studies, 2012, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

[26] Huynh, T.L.H., Developing a supporting system for managing water disputes in Ba river basin. Final Research Report, 2009, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD): Hanoi.

[27] Minh, V.T. and N.T.H. Hoa, A Study on Water Resources in Vietnam: Current Status, Problems and Solutions for Sustainable Consumption, in 57th ISSS Conference, 2013, ISSS: Haiphong, Vietnam. p. 86-87.

[28] Ha, T.M., A Review on the Development of Integrated Pest Management and Its Integration in Modern Agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2014. 2(04): p. 336-340.

[29] Midgley, G. and M. Reynolds, Systems/operational research and sustainable development: Towards a new agenda. Sustainable Development, 2004. 12(1): p. 56-64.

[30] Koralagama, D., M. Wijeratne, and W. De Silva, Emergence of participatory rural appraisal (PRA) technique as a strategy towards sustainable development: a Sri Lankan experience. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 2010. 108(2): p. 149-160.

[31] Roseland, M., Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in planning, 2000. 54(2): p. 73-132.

[32] Ahsan, K. and I. Gunawan, Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 2010. 28(1): p. 68-78.

[33] Maani, K.E. and R.Y. Canava, Systems thinking, system dynamics: Managing change and complexity. 2nd ed. 2007: Prentice Hall, Auckland, NZ.

[34] Nguyen, N.C. and O.J. Bosch, A systems thinking approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2012. 30(2): p. 104-115.

[35] Bosch, O., N. Nguyen, and T.M. Ha, Can Advancements in Economic and Managerial Practice be achieved without Systems Thinking Education as the Foundation? Business Systems Review, Special Issue on Systems Thinking for a Sustainable Economy – Selected papers of the 2nd B.S. Laboratory International Symposium, 2014. 3(02): p. 33-53.

[36] Wilby, J.M., Combining a systems framework with epidemiology in the study of emerging infectious disease. Systems research and behavioral science, 2005. 22(5): p. 385-398.

[37] Jackson, M.C., Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. 2003: Wiley Chichester.

[38] Midgley, G., Systems thinking. 2003: Sage London.

[39] Midgley, G., Systemic intervention for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 2006. 96(3): p. 466.

[40] Ison, R., Systems thinking and practice for action research, in The Sage Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice (2nd edition), P.W. Reason and H. Bradbury, Editors. 2008, Sage Publications: London, UK. p. 139–158.

[41] Ruttan, V.W., Integrated rural development programmes: A historical perspective. World Development, 1984. 12(4): p. 393-401.

[42] Cabrera, D., L. Colosi, and C. Lobdell, Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2008. 31(3): p. 299-310.

[43] Bosch, O., N.C. Nguyen, and D. Sun, Addressing the Critical Need for 'New Ways of Thinking' in Managing Complex Issues in a Socially Responsible Way. Business Systems Review (ISSN 2280-3866), 2013. 2(2): p. 48-70.

[44] Bosch, O.J.H., N.C. Nguyen, and K. Krishnamurthi, Systems-based Evolutionary Learning Laboratories to enable Systemic Entrepreneurship in a Complex World. Invited Keynote Address, in The 10th HSSS National & International Conference: "Systemic Entrepreneurship - Innovations, Business, Growth", The Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies (HSSS)2014: Athens, Greece.

[45] Kiura, T., et al., Appling a systems-based Evolutionary Learning Laboratory for the creation of a new business, in Proceedings of the Business Systems Laboratory - 2nd International Symposium "Systems thinking for a sustainable economy: Advancements in Economic and Managerial Theory and Practice”, 23-24 January 2014, G. Dominici, Editor 2014, Business Systems Review: Universitas Mercatorum, Roma, Italy.

[46] Kiura, T., et al., Using a systems-based Evolutionary Learning Laboratory to address the “NEET-Not in Employment, Education, or Training” issue in Japan, in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-20132013: Haiphong, Vietnam.

[47] Nguyen, N.C., O.J.H. Bosch, and K.E. Maani, Creating 'learning laboratories' for sustainable development in biospheres: a systems thinking approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2011. 28(1): p. 51-62.

[48] Nguyen, T.V., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Using the Evolutionary Learning Laboratory Approach to Establish a World First Model for Integrated Governance of Haiphong, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2014. 31(05): p. 627-641.

[49] Gates-Foundation. Grand Challenges Explorations Round 11: Labor Saving Strategies and Innovations for Women Smallholder Farmers. Grand Challenges in Global Health 2013 [cited 2013 02 August ]; Available from: http://www.grandchallenges.org/Explorations/Topics/Pages/WomenSmallholderFarmersRound11.aspx.

[50] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Applying an evolutionary learning laboratory approach for improving the quality of life for women smallholders in the Red River Delta of Vietnam, in European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research (EMCSR), 21-25 April 2014, J. Wilby, S. Blachfellner, and W. Hofkirchner, Editors. 2014, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science: Vienna, Austria. In Wilby et al. 2014 (Eds.) BoA-EMCSR-2014: 136-143. p. 136-143.

[51] Nguyen, N.C., et al., Educating systems thinking for sustainability: experience with a developing country. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2012. 29(1): p. 14-29.

[52] Ventana®. Vensim program (Release 6.1), Ventana Systems UK. 2011 [cited 2013 10 August]; Available from: http://www.ventanasystems.co.uk/vensim-6-1-released-may-2013/.

[53] Cain, J., C. Batchelor, and D. Waughray, Belief networks: a framework for the participatory development of natural resource management strategies. Environment, development and sustainability, 1999. 1(2): p. 123-133.

[54] Bellemare, M.F., As you sow, so shall you reap: The welfare impacts of contract farming. World Development, 2012. 40(7): p. 1418-1434.

[55] Barrett, C.B., et al., Smallholder participation in contract farming: Comparative evidence from five countries. World Development, 2012. 40(4): p. 715-730.

[56] Miyata, S., N. Minot, and D. Hu, Impact of contract farming on income: linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Development, 2009. 37(11): p. 1781-1790.

[57] Singh, S., Contracting out solutions: Political economy of contract farming in the Indian Punjab. World Development, 2002. 30(9): p. 1621-1638.

[58] Key, N. and D. Runsten, Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World development, 1999. 27(2): p. 381-401.

[59] Porter, G. and K. Phillips-Howard, Comparing contracts: an evaluation of contract farming schemes in Africa. World Development, 1997. 25(2): p. 227-238.

[60] Costales, A. and M. Catelo, Contract farming as an institution for integrating rural smallholders in markets for livestock products in developing countries:(I) Framework and applications, 2008, PPLPI Research Report.

[61] Saigenji, Y. and M. Zeller, Effect of contract farming on productivity and income of small holders: The case of tea production in north-western Vietnam, in The International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference2009: Beijing, China, pp.16-22. p. 16-22.

[62] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Necessary and sufficient conditions for agribusiness success of small-scale farming systems in Northern Vietnam. Business and Management Studies 2015. 1(2): p. 36-44.

[63] Benziger, V., Small fields, big money: Two successful programs in helping small farmers make the transition to high value-added crops. World Development, 1996. 24(11): p. 1681-1693.

[64] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Establishing and Evolutionary Learning Laboratory for improving the quality of life of Vietnamese women in small-scale agriculture: Part I - The current situation. Journal of Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2015. In Press (early view: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sres.2346/abstract).

[65] Galvin, P., A new vision for the Journal of Management & Organization: The role of context. Journal of Management & Organization, 2014. 20(01): p. 1-5.

[66] George, G., Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research. Management and Organization Review, 2015. 11(01): p. 5-10.

[67] Shapiro, D.L., M.A. Von Glinow, and Z. Xiao, Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 2007. 3(1): p. 129-152.

[68] Tsui, A.S., Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2006. 2(01): p. 1-13.

[69] Whetten, D.A., An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 2009. 5(1): p. 29-55.

[70] Ha, T.M., O.J.H. Bosch, and N.C. Nguyen, Practical contributions of the systems-based Evolutionary Learning Laboratory to knowledge and stakeholder management. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2015(In press): p. (early view: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11213-015-9363-2).

[71] Lewin, A.Y., Letter from the Editor. Management and Organization Review, 2015. 11(1): p. 1-3.

[72] Besser, T. and D. Ramsey, Resilient small rural towns and community shocks. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2013. 8(1): p. 117-134.

[73] White, S.S. and D. Ramsey, Farmers and rural Kansas communities: Planning for the future. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2014. 9(3): p. 227-242.

[74] Flora, C.B., J.L. Flora, and S. Fey, eds. Rural communities: Legacy and change. 2nd ed. 2004, Westview Press: Boulder, CO.

[75] Flora, C.B., C. Bregendahl, and H. Renting, Collaborative Community-supported Agriculture: Balancing Community Capitals for Producers and Consumers. Int. J. of Soc. of Agr. & Food, 2012. 19(3): p. 329-346.

[76] Emery, M. and C. Flora, Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development, 2006. 37(1): p. 19-35.

[77] Flints, R.W., Seeking resiliency in the development of sustainable communities. Human Ecology Review, 2010. 17(1): p. 44-57.

[78] Bolton, E., et al., Action research helps citizens prepare Madison County, Florida vision 2020. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2010. 5(3): p. 71-77.

[79] Rennie, F. and S.-L. Billing, Changing community perceptions of sustainable rural development in Scotland. Journal of Rural & Community Development, 2015. 10(2): p. 35-46.

[80] Sangole, N., et al., Community based participatory monitoring and evaluation: Impacts on farmer organization functioning, social capital and accountability. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2014. 9(2): p. 128-148.

[81] Kulig, J.C., D. Edge, and B. Joyce, Understanding community resiliency in rural communities through multimethod research. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2008. 3(3): p. 77–94.

[82] Reason, P. and H. Bradbury, Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. 2001: Sage.

[83] Coghlan, D., Interlevel dynamics in systemic action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2002. 15(4): p. 273-283.

[84] Kemmis, S., Action Research as a Practice-changing Practice. Educational Action Research, 2009. 17(3): p. 463-474.

[85] Flood, R.L., The relationship of ‘systems thinking’to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2010. 23(4): p. 269-284.

[86] Sankaran, S., T.B. Hou, and M. Orr, Incorporating systems thinking in organizational change projects using action research by practitioners conducting academic research, in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ISSS-20082008: Madison, Wisconsin.

[87] Winter, M., et al., The importance of ‘process’ in rethinking project management: the story of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 2006. 24(8): p. 650-662.

[88] Ha, T.M., Establishing a transformative learning framework for promoting organic farming in Northern Vietnam: a case study on organic tea production in Thai Nguyen province. Asian Journal of Business and Management, 2014. 2(03): p. 202-211.