IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 11 - Issue 01, January 2022 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Over All Performance Evaluation Review Of Faculties From The Perspectives Of The Senior Management

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Dr. Ahmed Mahade, Dr. Abdallah Elmahi

 

KEYWORDS

Evaluation, annual performance , university ranking, Faculty performance, Performance Methodologies, Senior Management, Faculty ranking.

 

ABSTRACT

This paper is intended to investigate the faculty annual Performance evaluation methods in Sudanese universities and review people involved in the evaluation process. This paper also looked at the perspectives of the senior management on evaluation system and templates. The main instrument to obtain the results was a survey. The participants were faculty administrational and teaching faculty at public universities. In recent years, many researchers have been conducting studies on similar areas, and many have shown positive outcomes. Studies have shown increases in positive evaluation and performance relations. The analyses of the results has proved the need for the comprehensive new model of evaluation to be used at Sudanese universities, It also showed that there is agreement upon the participants on the uses, effects and the impacts of the performance evaluation on both universities and people evaluated.

 

REFERENCES

[1] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955. (references)
[2] Arreola, R. Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. (2nd ed.) Bolton, Mass.: Anker, 2000.
[3] Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., and Schuster, J. H. The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
[4] J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.
[5] I. S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.
[6] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.
[7] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name Stand. Abbrev., in press.
[8] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].
[9] M. Young, The Technical Writer's Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
[10] Worcester, P. I. (1993). Faculty and administrator perceptions of faculty evaluation in a technical college (Order No. 9319419). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. (304059219). Retrieved from http://adezproxy.adu.ac.ae/docview/304059219?accountid=26149